Post number 3,000

This is the kind of milestone I usually miss until I’m well past it. But a few days ago I happened to notice we were coming up 3,000 posts here at smays.com. Now, that’s really not a lot of posts over a span of 5 1/2 years. But a fair amount of jotting for a journal that started with the tagline, "I’ve really got to start writing some of this down."

And while most of those 3,000 posts are short links to something someone else wrote and I found blog-worthy, this has been a good place to record those few original thoughts that popped into my head.

And every post is a thin, almost invisible thread, stretching out to become part of The Web. And every once in a while, someone plucks one of those threads and I get a little tingle of…connectedness? Hard to describe, but if you’re a blogger, you know what I’m talking about.

I have no idea what I’ll be doing a year from now… or 10 years from now… but I’m pretty sure I’ll be writing things down here. And I promise not to bring this up again until we get to 10,000.

Record everything, post everything

In March of this year, I posted audio of a speech by Jan Hindman, author of “There Is No Sex Fairy. For 34 years, Ms. Hindman studied and researched the problem of sexual abuse, working with both sexual offenders and sexual victims through mental health endeavors, the educational realm, as well as private practice.

She was a keynote speaker at a conference organized by one of our clients. I was so impressed by her intelligence and wit that I posted the audio here at smays.com.

Today I received an email from her niece, letting me know that Jan Hindman passed away suddenly a few days ago. She found my post (and the audio) with a Google search:

“…it has been very comforting to hear her voice. It made me smile to hear her wonderful messages and her great sense of humor one more time. She was so very special.”

This kind of thing happens more than you might expect. And it’s one of the things I like best about blogging. As far as I know, the speech I posted might be the only one (by Ms. Hindman) online. I hope other friends and admirers find –and take some comfort– from it.

All I need is one more ending

It’s the first day of anatomy class and the med students are being assigned cadavers. During the dissection process, one geeky but brilliant student discovers that his guy didn’t die from natural causes. He was, in fact, killed in a highly sophisticated manner that could only have been murder. The kind of high tech death that should have been undetectable.

We all know the next part. He takes his discovery to his professors, the cops, etc etc. Nobody listens.

The med student can’t find the dead guy’s name because the records have been erased. But his geeky-yet-adorable former girlfriend matches the face with images she finds online and discovers the guy was a blogger for the last ten or twelve years of his life.

The plot unfolds as our two protagonists dig back through the dead guy’s blog, looking for clues to who killed him and why.

Regular readers know this is as far as I get with my plots but, in a few days, Kay Henderson will come up with a thrilling conclusion.

If you can’t come up with a killer (snicker) ending, feel free to suggest a title.

Queen of Live Blogging

Google_earth_kayI rely on sites like engadget and gizmodo to live blog events like Wednesday’s big product launch of the new iPods. And I’m always amazed that anyone can listen/think/type that quickly.

But I’ll put my home girl Kay up against one and all when it comes to live blogging. Check out her coverage of Fred Thompson’s announcement in Des Moines yesterday. Seriously, it’s like being in the room…minus all the sweaty reporters.

Newsletters and blogs

In the last 4 or 5 years, I’ve had many occasions to talk with clients about their monthly/quarterly newsletter. Usually in the context of, "We want to email these suckers to everyone and (somehow) make them read them."

I try to persuade them that a blog is a better tool but requires a shift in perspective. More on that in a bit.

Here are Three Truths I’ve discovered about newsletters:

  1. Managers love newsletters.
  2. The people who have to "write" newsletters hate them.
  3. The people who receive newsletters are bored by them and –for the most part– never read them.

Why do managers love newsletters?

Managers love newsletters because they don’t have to write them… but do get to proof (several times) every word and every piece of clip art.

Managers see the newsletter as benign propaganda. A great tool for recognizing workers who put in a bunch of extra hours on a project, for no extra money.

Newsletters say "we are one big happy family and here’s what we’ve been up to since the last newsletter."

Why to the people who write the newsletters hate them?

Because they don’t really get to write them. They have no real say about the content and they can’t/don’t try for a human voice because it isn’t really coming from them. It’s from the boss (although she doesn’t write them either) or some middle manager who proofed all the life and fun out of the thing before letting it out the door.

Pulling together a newsletter every quarter (or every month, god forbid!) is the worst kind of cat herding. They beg and plead with department heads to submit something for the newsletter and they’re always late, so the "editor" is scrambling right up to deadline to pull the thing together. And it reads like it.

But, most of all, they hate the newsletter because they know that few, if any, read the damned thing.

Why do the recipients rarely read newsletters?

First and foremost, there is almost never anything "new" in them (see #2 above). In today’s wired, mobile, always connected world… something that happened 4 or 5 weeks ago is ancient history. And everyone knows that management would never allow anything really interesting to find it’s way into the newsletter anyway.

Why is a blog better?

To understand why a well written and maintained blog is a better communication tool, let’s look through the other end of the telescope.

Readers like blogs for all the reasons they hate newsletters. They have news. Usually every day. They’re written by real, live, flesh-and-blood people. With opinions and perspective and insights. They care about what they’re writing about, so I care too. And because I care, I subscribe to the blog’s RSS feed get the latest post when and where I want it, while it’s still fresh and relevant.

The person writing the blog loves doing it. They care about the subject and their passion and interest comes across in every post. They’ve been empowered and entrusted to communicate with their readers and they take the responsibility seriously. And because they post whenever some new or interesting comes along, it takes less time (or seems to). No tedious Page Maker layout or agonizing html hassles. Today’s blogging tools make posting as simple as an email.

Which brings us back to the manager. Why does he/she hate and fear the blog? In my experience it’s all about control. Specifically, the loss thereof. With a newsletter, the boss can edit and re-edit and edit again. Until he gets the perfect sanitized, homogenized, safe-for-all-pay-grades piece of corporate-speak.

Blogs don’t work that way. Blogs are living, breathing things. Which is one of the reasons they are fun to read. And so damned scary to "the people in charge." What if somebody writes something that gets us in trouble?

These days, I don’t waste a lot of energy trying to sell blogs over newsletters. When a client says, show me how to do this blog thing… I’m happy to show ’em the ropes. But if I see that they really aren’t there, I encourage them to go back to the newsletter. And I always get a mental image of a C130 flying low over a village, dropping leaflets ("Put down your weapons. We are here to help you"). The villagers never read these but they hang on to them because you never know when you’re gonna need some extra paper.

Key to efficient blogging

Pick3This post at E-Meida Tidbits is aimed at journalists who worry about the additional time it takes to blog. But I think this is good advice for any blogger.

“…the key to blogging efficiently is this: DO NOT treat it like writing an article. That is, make blogging part of your ongoing processes for research, notetaking, and communication.

A blog post is not (or at least, it shouldn’t be) a writing assignment you must prep for and deliver as a finished package. Let go of the idea that you must have everything nailed down, organized, and edited before you publish.”

I’ve been stressing (just a little) about my light posting of late and had this idea for a T-shirt.

Blogging the History of Learfield

Clyde Lear is blogging the history of our company, which he founded 35 years ago. This is a great use of the blog format and the idea was his alone. I’m helping get some of the audio added to his posts but this is his baby. And –as Clyde observed– if he doesn’t do it, it won’t get done.

His latest post includes a 10 minute air check –from one of our first radio station affiliates– of one of our first programs on Day One. Good stuff. Let’s give him lots of encouragement.

Transparent journalism

Sausage
If you’re in the news business, you should read this blog post by Radio Iowa (a Learfield network) News Director O. Kay Henderson. It’s a good example of a reporter allowing her readers/listeners to see how the sausage is made.

The post (and the story to which it refers) is about the network’s coverage of remarks made by Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden at the Iowa State Fair on Wednesday. Kay appropriately headlines her post "Splitting hairs with the Biden camp." (Read the post)

In the old (pre-blog) days, if the subject of a news story thought it inaccurate or unfair, the reporter could respond, "I stand by my story" and that would be the end of it.

In this instance, Kay has used her blog to add context to the story and I think everyone is better off for it. Here’s what we reported. Here’s what people thought about our report. And here’s some background we didn’t include in the story.

This is why I think every news organization should be blogging. We rely on journalists to cover important news. It’s important that we trust them to do it fairly and accurately. Letting us see how they do the job makes it easier.

Buying blog love

A co-worker dropped off a copy of a statement he received for some batteries he recently purchased (from Tenergy Corporation/All-Battery.com). At the bottom of the statement:

We pay $30 for your professional reviews and opinions.

Please review the products listed on all-battery.com

  • The review must be more than 400 words and shall be objective and must be posted on any well known forum or website
  • Constructive comments are always welcome
  • Must copy your review to "Product Reviews" section at http://forums.all-battery.com
  • Upon approving your review, we will send a $30 Gift certificat to you thru Email or PM

I’ve been reading about this kind of paid review but this is the first pitch I’ve seen. This raises so many interesting (to me) question:

  • Will they "approve" my review if I say something negative about their product or company?
  • What do they mean by "constructive comments?"
  • Will I get my gift certificate if I write nice things but disclose to my readers that I’m getting paid?
  • How many of their customers have blogs and websites? How many post to forums?

This just doesn’t smell right to me. If I discovered that a blogger was getting paid for reviews, I’d have trouble trusting anything else he/she wrote. If the company’s motives are pure, why not clearly state that the offer applies to any well-intentioned, objective review. And if someone has something critical to say, wouldn’t that be worth a $30 certificate?

There’s a way to do this, of course. If someone in the Casio (digital camera) marketing department noticed that I use/like/blog about their cameras, they could send me a new model and ask me to try it out and blog my impressions. Good or bad. They won’t have to give me the camera, because if it’s good, I’ll probably buy it. AND write nice things about the product.