Top traits for hiring new people

“I just returned from a three-day seminar with Paradigm, a highly-respected sales training firm, and they recommend that managers ensure that new account executives are “adaptable” and “resilient” before hiring them. In fact, these two traits should be at the top of the list in the hiring process because the media world is changing so quickly.

Wouldn’t it be interesting to apply this same thinking when hiring for new journalists? That adaptability and resiliency are just as important as storytelling skills, for example? Of course, those traits not as easy to identify as watching a resume tape and looking at online writing examples (both of which should be required for reporters, by the way), but it means we need to ask job candidates to explain specific examples of how they’ve flexed with change and bounced back from failure.”

— Cory Bergman, Lost Remote

Learfield’s original business plan

In his latest “History of Learfield” blog post, founder and CEO Clyde Lear shares the business plan (below) he put together 35 years ago, when he was starting the company. If you’ve ever started your own business, or think you might someday like to start your own business, you should download the PDF file and read Clyde’s plan (just 27 pages).

This a fascinating look at the very earliest beginnings of what has turned into a multi-million dollar company (Disclosure: the company I work for).

As a blogger, I love that Clyde chose to share this bit of history on his blog. It’s been sitting in his desk for 35 years and now he’s put it out there for employees, friends, family and the world.

Clyde’s First Business Plan (PDF)

“You become what you say you are.”

Scott Donation, blogging at Advertising Age, says your customers are more important than your brand:

“I hate to say it, but we need to re-draw the wheel one more time. This time, take the brand out of the center spot and replace it with your customers—audience and advertisers. Yes, media products should still think of themselves as brands, but everything they do needs to be organized around serving the customer, and the only way to create a truly customer-focused operation (rather than just mouthing the words) is to start at the core and build out. “You become what you say you are,” a savvy publishing-industry chieftain said during a recent lunch with me and my management team.” [Thanks, Roger]

Newsletters and blogs

In the last 4 or 5 years, I’ve had many occasions to talk with clients about their monthly/quarterly newsletter. Usually in the context of, "We want to email these suckers to everyone and (somehow) make them read them."

I try to persuade them that a blog is a better tool but requires a shift in perspective. More on that in a bit.

Here are Three Truths I’ve discovered about newsletters:

  1. Managers love newsletters.
  2. The people who have to "write" newsletters hate them.
  3. The people who receive newsletters are bored by them and –for the most part– never read them.

Why do managers love newsletters?

Managers love newsletters because they don’t have to write them… but do get to proof (several times) every word and every piece of clip art.

Managers see the newsletter as benign propaganda. A great tool for recognizing workers who put in a bunch of extra hours on a project, for no extra money.

Newsletters say "we are one big happy family and here’s what we’ve been up to since the last newsletter."

Why to the people who write the newsletters hate them?

Because they don’t really get to write them. They have no real say about the content and they can’t/don’t try for a human voice because it isn’t really coming from them. It’s from the boss (although she doesn’t write them either) or some middle manager who proofed all the life and fun out of the thing before letting it out the door.

Pulling together a newsletter every quarter (or every month, god forbid!) is the worst kind of cat herding. They beg and plead with department heads to submit something for the newsletter and they’re always late, so the "editor" is scrambling right up to deadline to pull the thing together. And it reads like it.

But, most of all, they hate the newsletter because they know that few, if any, read the damned thing.

Why do the recipients rarely read newsletters?

First and foremost, there is almost never anything "new" in them (see #2 above). In today’s wired, mobile, always connected world… something that happened 4 or 5 weeks ago is ancient history. And everyone knows that management would never allow anything really interesting to find it’s way into the newsletter anyway.

Why is a blog better?

To understand why a well written and maintained blog is a better communication tool, let’s look through the other end of the telescope.

Readers like blogs for all the reasons they hate newsletters. They have news. Usually every day. They’re written by real, live, flesh-and-blood people. With opinions and perspective and insights. They care about what they’re writing about, so I care too. And because I care, I subscribe to the blog’s RSS feed get the latest post when and where I want it, while it’s still fresh and relevant.

The person writing the blog loves doing it. They care about the subject and their passion and interest comes across in every post. They’ve been empowered and entrusted to communicate with their readers and they take the responsibility seriously. And because they post whenever some new or interesting comes along, it takes less time (or seems to). No tedious Page Maker layout or agonizing html hassles. Today’s blogging tools make posting as simple as an email.

Which brings us back to the manager. Why does he/she hate and fear the blog? In my experience it’s all about control. Specifically, the loss thereof. With a newsletter, the boss can edit and re-edit and edit again. Until he gets the perfect sanitized, homogenized, safe-for-all-pay-grades piece of corporate-speak.

Blogs don’t work that way. Blogs are living, breathing things. Which is one of the reasons they are fun to read. And so damned scary to "the people in charge." What if somebody writes something that gets us in trouble?

These days, I don’t waste a lot of energy trying to sell blogs over newsletters. When a client says, show me how to do this blog thing… I’m happy to show ’em the ropes. But if I see that they really aren’t there, I encourage them to go back to the newsletter. And I always get a mental image of a C130 flying low over a village, dropping leaflets ("Put down your weapons. We are here to help you"). The villagers never read these but they hang on to them because you never know when you’re gonna need some extra paper.

Blinks ad adlets

“Miniature radio ads, spanning just a few seconds in length, are a hit in Hollywood, says market leader Clear Channel Communications Inc., which launched the spots known as blinks and adlets last year.

Homer Simpson’s unmistakable “D’oh!” or “Woohoo!” followed by the familiar tagline “Tonight on Fox!” for example, has been a popular two-second ad — known as a blink — for Fox Broadcasting.

Unlike longer ads, which run during minutes-long commercial breaks, the blinks and adlets are slipped in between songs.

Clear Channel declined to disclose pricing, but one ad executive said five-second adlets typically fetch as much as 20% of 60-second ads, which cost about $800 in major markets, and two-second blinks cost 10%.”  

— From latimes.com

Banner Blindness

Jakob Nielsen shares results of new eyetracking studies which confirm –"for the umpteenth time"– that banner blindness is real:

"Users almost never look at anything that looks like an advertisement, whether or not it’s actually an ad. On hundreds of pages, users didn’t fixate on ads. Scanning is more common than reading, but users will sometimes dig into an article if they really care about it."

Buying blog love

A co-worker dropped off a copy of a statement he received for some batteries he recently purchased (from Tenergy Corporation/All-Battery.com). At the bottom of the statement:

We pay $30 for your professional reviews and opinions.

Please review the products listed on all-battery.com

  • The review must be more than 400 words and shall be objective and must be posted on any well known forum or website
  • Constructive comments are always welcome
  • Must copy your review to "Product Reviews" section at http://forums.all-battery.com
  • Upon approving your review, we will send a $30 Gift certificat to you thru Email or PM

I’ve been reading about this kind of paid review but this is the first pitch I’ve seen. This raises so many interesting (to me) question:

  • Will they "approve" my review if I say something negative about their product or company?
  • What do they mean by "constructive comments?"
  • Will I get my gift certificate if I write nice things but disclose to my readers that I’m getting paid?
  • How many of their customers have blogs and websites? How many post to forums?

This just doesn’t smell right to me. If I discovered that a blogger was getting paid for reviews, I’d have trouble trusting anything else he/she wrote. If the company’s motives are pure, why not clearly state that the offer applies to any well-intentioned, objective review. And if someone has something critical to say, wouldn’t that be worth a $30 certificate?

There’s a way to do this, of course. If someone in the Casio (digital camera) marketing department noticed that I use/like/blog about their cameras, they could send me a new model and ask me to try it out and blog my impressions. Good or bad. They won’t have to give me the camera, because if it’s good, I’ll probably buy it. AND write nice things about the product.

Mark Ramsey: “You’re not in the ‘radio’ business anymore

Mr. Ramsey says the advertising industry is about to redefine radio’s “category.” According to a report by MediaVest, radio is now “audio”:

“In a new report being circulated to clients, MediaVest has adopted the position that terrestrial broadcast radio should no longer be looked at as a discrete medium in communications plans, but as part of a greater array of audio media–including satellite, online, mobile and a variety of personal media device technologies, such as iPods, other MP3 players, and even television, which increasingly is being used as an audio-only medium.”

“…radio should no longer be looked at as a discrete medium, but as part of a greater array of audio media.”

Ouch.

I agree with Mr. Ramsey that a) this has been coming for a bit and b) it is an important shift that too many “broadcasters” still don’t get. I encourage you to read the full post.